**Technical Tutoring Home · Site Index · Advanced Books · Speed Arithmetic · Math Index · Algebra Index · Trig Index · Chemistry Index · Gift Shop · ****Harry
Potter DVDs, Videos, Books, Audio CDs and Cassettes****
· ****Lord
of the Rings DVDs, Videos, Books, Audio CDs and Cassettes**** · Winnie-the-Pooh
DVDs, Videos, Books, Audio CDs, Audio Cassettes and Toys · STAR WARS DVDs and VHS Videos**

Basic Math Operations

**Addition · Multiplication · Subtraction · Division · ****Identities****
· Powers and Exponentiation · ****Recommended Books**

**Commutative
Property of Addition · Associative Property of Addition · Distributive Property · Additive Identity:
Zero**

We'll assume the reader can add digits, so that 2 + 2 = 4 is not a surprise. In addition (heh!), we'll also assume that the fundamentals of "carrying" are not that big of a problem, and so most readers will immediately know how we did

We're more interested here in the general properties of addition that impact algebra. With that in mind, let a, b and c be three real numbers. Then the following properties of addition turn out to be usable and important:

Commutative Property of Addition

(Addition is the same regardless of the order one adds the numbers, i.e., forwards addition is the same as backwards addition).

Examples

Note that negative numbers are sometimes enclosed in parentheses to avoid confusion between the sign of the number and the addition operation. This is merely a matter of style – many textbook writers use spacing to set off the difference instead.

Associative Property of Addition

(Addition of a list of numbers is the same regardless of which are added together first, i.e., grouping does not matter)

Examples

**Commutative
Property of Multiplication · Associative Property of
Multiplication · Distributive Property · Multiplicative Identity**

Again, we’ll assume that the basics of multiplication are well known, so that 2x2=2· 2=2*2=4. There are obviously several different notations in use, depending when one learns it and what context one learns it. We will use all of these notations, as well as another: when using variables, multiplication is assumed when symbols are merely written next to each other.

Multiplication follows the same two laws just described for addition.

Commutative Property of Multiplication

Examples

We are following the same convention as with addition. Note that just writing numbers next to each other is a poor idea because, for example, 32 can be confused with 3· 2. Thus, we need some sort of symbol to make the two distinct. There are several correct ways to do this – in other articles, we’ll make a lot of use of parentheses, so that 3· 2 will be written 3(2) or (3)(2). Experience with the notation will help make it very clear what is meant.

Associative Property of Multiplication

Examples

Please note that we do not have to limit ourselves to parentheses; the last computation could have been written

This looks a bit neater. Again, such things are a matter of style, and the reader is encouraged to use whatever bracketing makes the most sense and allows clear, proper ordering of calculations.

When both addition and multiplication appear in a single mathematical expression, this distributive law controls the operation. This is probably one of the most important laws in mathematics; getting it wrong guarantees bad calculations! The "reverse" is NOT CORRECT:

Examples

We’re going to define subtraction in terms of **addition of the negative**:

This means that subtraction is a shortcut or an abbreviation of the above addition
operation. The "triple equals" sign used here means **definition**, and is
meant to signify an **operation that is always true**. It is a stronger statement than
a simple equals sign.

Examples

Subtraction is not *in general* commutative:

Example

Nor is it *in general* associative:

Example

We’re going to define division in terms of **multiplication of the inverse**.
Please see the discussion of multiplicative inverse
below for more info. For now, suppose that a > 1 and that

The number b has a very important function – it is called the multiplicative inverse of a, also known as the inverse of a. Naively, we can write

but it should be pointed out that this is not really a definition. In order to properly
define division, we would have to discuss **rational numbers** and how they work.
Instead of doing that now, we’ll simply take it as given that the reader intuitively
understands fractions. With this definition of inverse, we can tackle division:

Example

Suppose a = 2. Then

Note that the decimal expansion 0.5000… is the result of long division, a subject we are avoiding here (for a discussion, see the division article). We can "prove" that 0.5000… is the inverse of 2 by multiplying:

To the extent that this is rather unsatisfying, we must ask the reader to suspend disbelief. The mechanics of division are complicated, and deserve a separate article.

Now we’ll use this notion to do a division.

Example

Note that we expanded 6 into 2· 3 and canceled the 3’s. This is a bit sloppy, but again, our definition of division is intuitive rather than precise.

This definition of subtraction is based on the principle of the **additive identity**,
also known as **zero**. Zero is neutral with respect to addition:

Another way to say this is:

What this allows us to do (among other things) is add the same quantity to either side of an equation.

Suppose we start with an equation we know is true:

If this is true then certainly

Therefore we can add the two equations to get

This is clearly and always true. The important point is we **can always add the same
thing to both sides**. Similarly, since

we **can always subtract the same thing from both sides of an equation**.

As mentioned above, as long as a is non-zero, the relation between a and its multiplicative inverse is

Therefore, 1 is the neutral element for multiplication just as zero is the neutral element for addition. For any real number a,

The useful application of this is that we can take a true equation

and multiply it on both sides by the same thing, say b,

which will also be true.

A comment about division

We can get around a lot of the complications of division by simply replacing it with multiplication by the inverse. The difficulties inherent in this arise when we try to get an inverse of zero (undefined) or an irrational number (which does not have a repeating decimal expansion and so cannot be calculated by doing a long division). Irrational numbers won’t be much of a concern for now, since we can approximate most of them to as many decimal places as we need. In the rare case where we must deal with an irrational number exactly, we will just use a symbolic representation of it, for example

and just carry it along in our calculations.

Like subtraction, division is neither commutative nor associative.

For a little extra background on why division is a complicated subject, please see the articles on number systems and division.

Repeated multiplication of the same number are usually expressed as a power of that number, so that

and so on. The superscript or **exponent** is simply the number of times the number
or **base** is multiplied times itself. Exponentiation follows some simple laws that
follow directly from the above definition, the first being

For example,

Before going further, we need to define some "weird" exponents. Fractional powers are really combinations of roots and powers

so that, for example

Negative powers denote reciprocals:

For example,

With these definitions, we can say

for example,

We have now dealt with natural numbers, integers (i.e., including negative numbers) and rational numbers as exponents. So far we have not dealt with real number exponents, in particular irrational numbers. A proper treatment of this subject really requires calculus, and so we’ll avoid dealing with it at this time.

One further note that should be mentioned at this time is the nature of the base number. It should be clear that an irrational number in the base presents problems for practical calculation. For example, how does one calculate the following number?

Worse, how does one calculate a number such as this one?

The methods of advanced calculus provide ways to calculate such numbers to arbitrary precision. We won’t deal with how to do this here, but we will point out that modern calculators will do an adequate job of calculating these numbers, up to about 12 decimal places.

College Algebra (Schaum's Outlines)

The classic algebra problem book - very light on theory, plenty of problems with full solutions, more problems with answers

Schaum's Easy Outline: College Algebra

A simplified and updated version of the classic Schaum's Outline. Not as complete as the previous book, but enough for most students